What is A System

A baseline assessment will help you understand how interconnected your commercial process is, figure out your strengths, understand and prioritize the barriers preventing you from success, and then help determine where you’re wasting resources.

System Collapse and Innovation Cycle | Growth Enablement

System Collapse and Innovation Cycle

A Framework for Understanding Organizational Change

Exploring the cyclical nature of system innovation, operation, and inevitable collapse, with insights into transforming sales and marketing from a revenue-centric to a value-centric model.

© 2025 Growth Enablement, LLC

The Cycle of Human Nature and Systems Collapse

Scientific Validation

This cyclical pattern has been confirmed by research in complex adaptive systems theory, institutional economics, and resilience science. As Thomas Kuhn demonstrated in his landmark work "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions," even scientific paradigms themselves follow this pattern of emergence, institutionalization, and eventual replacement when anomalies accumulate that cannot be explained within the existing framework.

"Systems inevitably face critical transitions when they become too rigid to adapt to changing conditions. These state shifts are characterized by sudden reorganization after periods of gradual stress accumulation."
— Marten Scheffer, Critical Transitions in Nature and Society

Throughout history, human systems follow a predictable pattern of innovation, operation, and eventual collapse. This cycle aligns with the Panarchy model in resilience theory, which describes how all complex adaptive systems move through phases of growth, conservation, collapse, and renewal.

System Evolution
1. Innovate
2. Design
3. Educate
4. Expertise
5. Collapse
α (Reorganization)
r (Exploitation)
K (Conservation)
Ω (Release)
1

Innovation Phase

Leaders create new systems in response to changes in the external environment. During this phase, visionaries see possibilities that others miss and develop novel approaches that address emerging needs and challenges.

Panarchy Equivalent: Reorganization (α) phase — The period of renewal where resources are reorganized into new configurations, enabling innovation and setting the stage for a new cycle.

Key characteristics:

  • Openness to experimentation and risk-taking
  • Focus on first principles rather than established norms
  • Rapid iteration and learning from failures
  • Questioning of fundamental assumptions
2

Design Phase

Designers refine the innovation through trial and error, developing mechanisms to extract more value from the system. This phase is characterized by rapid learning and development of best practices.

Panarchy Equivalent: Early Exploitation (r) phase — The period of rapid growth where resources are readily available and the system expands quickly, establishing its fundamental patterns.

Key characteristics:

  • Refinement of original ideas into practical applications
  • Development of processes and frameworks
  • Identification of patterns and optimization opportunities
  • Creation of performance metrics and measurement systems
3

Education Phase

Educators formalize the learnings into structured forms, guides, and training materials. Knowledge becomes codified and transferable, enabling broader adoption of the system.

Panarchy Equivalent: Late Exploitation (r) phase — The system continues growing but begins to establish more rigid structures and standardization to scale its operations efficiently.

Key characteristics:

  • Standardization of practices and terminology
  • Development of certification programs and formal training
  • Creation of scalable onboarding processes
  • Simplification of complex concepts for widespread adoption
4

Expertise Phase

Experts develop deep specialization in established practices, often losing sight of the original principles. The system becomes increasingly rigid as expertise focuses on executing the established playbook rather than adapting to changes.

Panarchy Equivalent: Conservation (K) phase — The system maximizes efficiency but becomes increasingly rigid and interconnected, optimizing existing structures at the cost of adaptability.

Key characteristics:

  • Emergence of orthodoxy and resistance to new ideas
  • Increasing emphasis on following established processes
  • Growth of specialized roles and internal jargon
  • Diminishing returns from system optimization
  • Focus shifts from adaptation to preservation of the status quo
5

Collapse Phase

The system fails to adapt to significant changes in the external environment. What once was innovative becomes dogmatic and rigid, ultimately leading to collapse and creating space for new innovation.

Panarchy Equivalent: Release (Ω) phase — The system's accumulated rigidities make it vulnerable to disruption, leading to a rapid release of resources and breakdown of established structures.

Key characteristics:

  • Growing disparity between system outputs and environmental needs
  • Resistance to fundamental change from stakeholders invested in the status quo
  • Increasing resources required to maintain diminishing returns
  • Crisis events that expose fundamental flaws in the system
  • Emergence of new leaders with fresh perspectives

Scientific Evidence for Cyclical System Dynamics

The cycle described in this framework has been validated across multiple scientific disciplines:

Resilience Theory

Demonstrates how systems accumulate rigidities during stability periods, eventually requiring creative destruction for renewal.

Organizational Ecology

Shows how organizational inertia creates vulnerability to environmental shifts, leading to selection events.

Innovation Studies

Describes how dominant designs emerge, stabilize, and eventually collapse when disruptive technologies emerge.

These scientific frameworks affirm that state shifts and system collapses are not anomalies but predictable phases in cyclic processes - essential for long-term adaptation and evolution.